The problem with “standard” counseling in urgent situations
Most couples get 50–60 minutes once a week. In calm seasons, that’s fine. In crisis, it can feel like you barely start before the session ends, then spend six more days destabilizing. Research on therapy “dose” shows improvement grows with session count—so when the house is on fire, more time up front can help.
Below are three situations where traditional weekly counseling often isn’t the best first move—and what tends to work better.
1) When there’s infidelity (affair discovery or disclosure)
Why weekly counseling struggles: the pain is acute, trust is shattered, and you need containment + clarity quickly. Affair recovery benefits from a structured protocol (immediate stabilization, full story/meaning-making, and a guided trust-rebuild phase) that’s hard to accomplish in tiny weekly increments.
What to try instead
-
Marathon/Intensive format (multi-hour, multi-day) to front-load the hardest work and stop the spiral.
2) When one spouse wants out (a “mixed-agenda” couple)
If one partner is leaning out and the other is leaning in, standard couples therapy assumes a shared goal you don’t have yet. That mismatch breeds stalemate.
What to try instead
-
Discernment counseling helps each partner gain clarity and confidence about the next right step—separation, status quo, or a committed trial of couples therapy—before doing deep “fix the relationship” work. It was developed specifically for mixed-agenda couples and is supported by emerging evidence and practice literature.
3) When you’re in acute crisis (but still committed to repair)
When you’re flooded, sleeping in separate rooms, or having daily blowups, waiting weeks for traction can feel impossible. A compressed, high-dose start can de-escalate and build momentum.
What to try instead
-
Marathon couples therapy / intensive marriage retreat: 15–20 hours over 2–3 days to map patterns, practice repair, and leave with a plan—then use weekly follow-ups to consolidate gains.
Quick note on effectiveness: Broadly, couples therapy does work (e.g., EFT and IBCT meta-analyses), but format and timing should fit the problem. Intensives aren’t “better” than weekly in all cases; they’re often better-matched for crises.
FAQ
Does marriage counseling work—or is this just hype for retreats?
Yes, it works for many couples. Meta-analyses show Imago, EFT and behavioral couple therapy reduce distress. But in affairs, mixed-agenda, or acute crisis, a different entry point (discernment, structured affair work, or intensives) is often more effective initially.
How do I know if we’re “mixed-agenda”?
If one of you wants to save the marriage and the other is unsure or leaning out, that’s mixed-agenda. Discernment counseling is designed to help you decide your next step with compassion.
If we do an intensive, will we still need weekly therapy?
Usually, yes. Think of an intensive as the jump-start; short follow-ups help consolidate skills and accountability.
We’re dealing with an affair. What should happen first?
Immediate stabilization and transparency, then a structured protocol for meaning-making and trust rebuilding (often in longer early sessions).
We can’t clear 2–3 days for an intensive—any alternative?
Some practices offer extended blocks (e.g., 3–4 hours) across consecutive days to approximate the benefits of marathon work.
Sources
-
Discernment counseling (mixed-agenda couples): PubMed review & overview; outcome paper.
-
Affair recovery protocol: Gordon, Baucom & Snyder, JMFT (2004).
-
Efficacy of EFT/IBCT (does marriage counseling work?): Rathgeber et al., JMFT meta-analysis (2019).
-
Therapy dose/response context: De Geest et al., Frontiers in Psychology (2019)
-
Marathon couples therapy (format description): Gottman Institute page.
CONTINUE RESEARCHING…
- Can this marriage be saved?
- 4 things that will happen on your marriage retreat
- How to make sure marriage counseling will work for you
